Is Uber a proof that customer loyalty still exists?
When I started Marketing, the pursuit of loyalty was everything. Loyal customers were the
key to profitable business, with everyone taught at birth that the cost of
acquiring a new customer was by some multiple considerably harder than keeping
the ones you already have.
Customer research often talked to “lapsed”
purchasers in an often vain attempt to work out why they’d left. One magazine
publisher would personally call anyone who cancelled their subscription to find
out why. The feedback he got was better than any Focus Group’s. He'd usually
follow up the call on whatever it was the lapsed purchaser had raised as issue.
And more often than not, the customer renewed their subscription after taking
his call.
Al Ries, author of the 22 Immutable Laws of Marketing defined 'brand' as a “promise of consistency”, with the implicit guarantee that if
marketing teams followed the rules of successful brand management, they'd
naturally creat armies of fiercely loyal customers ignoring competitive offers
and staying loyal to the “brand”.
Get the brand right and then set about delighting
and surprising your customers and watch the money roll in. Then slowly
implement premium pricing. That was pretty much the business model for a long
time in the business.
So what
changed, apart from everything?
The first driver of change was probably the
emergence of abundant choice. With so much
manufacturing now emanating from the same regions and with everybody using the
same software to design products, in most growing markets nowadays we’re
overwhelmed by unparalleled choice.
Big name brands have to be really special to stay
ahead of copycat and “own” labels. In the world of high-end electronics for
example, Apple seem really good at it; Sony, not so much.
But if you’re buying something more basic, like a
kettle, where the only key performance metric is the ability to boil water,
it's increasingly a war on pricing. Retail giants Shoprite, Target and KMart have revived struggling businesses as
increasingly vibrant retail offerings by selling a range of nice enough, no
name kettles that are competent at boiling water; for a quarter of the cost of
the big names.
And that’s a pointer towards the second big change. Everything’s good nowadays. There was a time when
buying ‘foreign’ music was the thing. Today, that comes second to downloading
Nigerian music or music from Nigerian stars.
‘Rust’ used
to be a prime consideration when buying a second hand, now, in-car Bluetooth
and reversing cameras are in; and you can’t fail to see how much the world has
changed.
But undeniably the biggest thing that’s changed is
that we now all have so much free access to global
information.
And that access to information means we get to hear
about good new things quicker than ever, with no inhibitions of geography or
language; bringing us back to the success of Uber.
Uber decides which town to launch in next, by looking at
where people worldwide have downloaded their app. With their publicity machine
generating positive stories across worldwide media, Uber has noticed that
people download the app even if Uber isn't in their town yet, or
their country for that matter.
And when Uber spots that a heap of people in
a new market have downloaded the app, they've painlessly created a readymade
market of potential customers just waiting for them to launch.
For those of us brought up with the notion of
spotting "buying signals", downloading Uber's app is more akin
to an offer of marriage. In marketing terms, it’s the ultimate virtuous circle
and as close as we''ll get to a digital version of what we used to call word of
mouth. Perfect!
Until, of course, a competitor comes along. In the
language of old school marketing, Uber's decision to take on the taxi
industry, worldwide, was a Big, Hairy and Audacious Goal.
That they pulled it off will no doubt be the subject of marketing texts for
years to come.
Almost every week I see an article about the Uberisation of
something or other. Some may even talk of how Uber users are so loyal,
that they no longer use the word taxi. It's like Hoover, or Levi's.
Until of course that competitor comes along, Uber
is a terrific brand. It's trusted and consistent across barriers of language
and culture. It's supporting a revolution in the way people work and represents
something that people want to belong to.
They've already achieved what most
marketers can only dream of. Yet the biggest marketing issue for Uber is the same as any other business winning (or
struggling to keep afloat) in the digital age and that's the notion of customer loyalty.
And with news arriving of new pretenders to Uber's
throne, the true test of Uber’s customer loyalty will be the
arrival of a shiny new competitor who understands the customer even better, especially
if it’s cheaper.
Previously loyal Uber customers will weigh
up the new product offering and if it ticks a box of "better" and
there's no great price difference or other barrier to purchase, they'll
probably give it a go. And if it's also significantly cheaper, well...
Alun Probert is a marketer, writer,
Strategy
and Marketing expert, passionate about helping people do things
better.
Comments
Post a Comment